Current:Home > reviewsSpecial counsel asks judge in Trump's Jan. 6 case to implement protections for jurors -Dynamic Money Growth
Special counsel asks judge in Trump's Jan. 6 case to implement protections for jurors
View
Date:2025-04-15 14:54:41
Special counsel Jack Smith's team is urging the judge overseeing Donald Trump's federal election interference case to implement protections for potential jurors, citing the former president's conduct on social media regarding people involved in his various legal battles.
Smith's team specifically cites Trump's post about the judge's clerk in his ongoing $250 million civil fraud trial, which last week prompted the judge in the case to issue an oral order restricting all parties from speaking publicly about his court staff.
"There are other good reasons in this case for the Court to impose these restrictions and enforce this District's standard prohibition against publicizing jurors' identities," Smith's team said in Tuesday's filing. "Chief among them is the defendant's continued use of social media as a weapon of intimidation in court proceedings."
MORE: Trump opposes special counsel's request for gag order in Jan. 6 case
"In addition to the record before the Court from the Government's previous filings ... just last week the defendant escalated his conduct and publicly attacked the trial judge's law clerk in his pending civil fraud trial in New York State Supreme Court," the filing said.
This request comes as Judge Tanya Chutkan is set to hear oral arguments on the government's proposed limited gag order in the case on Monday.
Trump in August pleaded not guilty to charges of undertaking a "criminal scheme" to overturn the results of the 2020 election by enlisting a slate of so-called "fake electors," using the Justice Department to conduct "sham election crime investigations," trying to enlist the vice president to "alter the election results," and promoting false claims of a stolen election as the Jan. 6 riot raged -- all in an effort to subvert democracy and remain in power.
In a separate filing, the special counsel is asking Judge Chutkan to require Trump to formally notify the court of his intention to rely on advice of counsel as a defense, given that his lawyers have said publicly that's part of their legal strategy.
The special counsel says that at least 25 witnesses in the case have withheld information, communications and documents "based on assertions of attorney-client privilege."
If Trump were to formally invoke the advice-of-counsel defense in court, as has been done publicly by him and his attorneys, then attorney-client privilege would be waived and the special counsel would receive additional discovery.
The 25 witnesses, Smith's team says, include alleged "co-conspirators, former campaign employees, the campaign itself, outside attorneys, a non-attorney intermediary, and even a family member of the defendant."
veryGood! (973)
Related
- New data highlights 'achievement gap' for students in the US
- The best tech gifts, gadgets for the holidays featured on 'The Today Show'
- Trump names Andrew Ferguson as head of Federal Trade Commission to replace Lina Khan
- As a Major California Oil Producer Eyes Carbon Storage, Thousands of Idle Wells Await Cleanup
- Stamford Road collision sends motorcyclist flying; driver arrested
- 'Unimaginable situation': South Korea endures fallout from martial law effort
- Snoop Dogg Details "Kyrptonite" Bond With Daughter Cori Following Her Stroke at 24
- 'We are all angry': Syrian doctor describes bodies from prisons showing torture
- Will the 'Yellowstone' finale be the last episode? What we know about Season 6, spinoffs
- Australian man arrested for starting fire at Changi Airport
Ranking
- Former Danish minister for Greenland discusses Trump's push to acquire island
- Mitt Romney’s Senate exit may create a vacuum of vocal, conservative Trump critics
- 'Yellowstone' Season 5, Part 2: Here's when the final episode comes out and how to watch
- McConnell absent from Senate on Thursday as he recovers from fall in Capitol
- A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
- Biden says he was ‘stupid’ not to put his name on pandemic relief checks like Trump did
- Neanderthals likely began 'mixing' with modern humans later than previously thought
- The Daily Money: Now, that's a lot of zeroes!
Recommendation
The company planning a successor to Concorde makes its first supersonic test
'We are all angry': Syrian doctor describes bodies from prisons showing torture
What is Sora? Account creation paused after high demand of AI video generator
Arizona city sues federal government over PFAS contamination at Air Force base
New Zealand official reverses visa refusal for US conservative influencer Candace Owens
'Vanderpump Rules' star DJ James Kennedy arrested on domestic violence charges
Deadly chocolate factory caused by faulty gas fitting, safety board finds
Biden says he was ‘stupid’ not to put his name on pandemic relief checks like Trump did