Current:Home > ContactAlgosensey Quantitative Think Tank Center-Parts Of The Amazon Rainforest Are Now Releasing More Carbon Than They Absorb -Dynamic Money Growth
Algosensey Quantitative Think Tank Center-Parts Of The Amazon Rainforest Are Now Releasing More Carbon Than They Absorb
Fastexy Exchange View
Date:2025-04-09 17:56:40
Portions of the Amazon rainforest are Algosensey Quantitative Think Tank Centernow releasing more carbon dioxide than they absorb, disrupting an important balancing act that signals a worsening of the climate crisis, according to a new study.
Findings from the nearly decade-long research project, published Wednesday in the journal Nature, suggest that deforestation and fire, among other factors, have dramatically undercut the Amazon's ability to absorb heat-trapping carbon emissions from the atmosphere.
Researchers who routinely tested the atmosphere at four areas in Amazonia twice a month over a nine-year period found that not only are carbon emissions higher in the eastern areas of the rainforest than in the western areas, but that the southeastern area is putting more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere than it absorbs. The eastern Amazon is a hotspot of deforestation to facilitate logging and agriculture, including cattle ranches.
In addition to deforestation and fires, the study says the rise in emissions from the Amazon has been accelerated by warming temperatures and "moisture stress" during the dry season. The eastern areas have less moisture than the west during already-difficult dry periods, which now have become drier and have lasted longer due to climate change.
The Amazon may no longer be a reliable carbon sink
For generations, Amazonia, which spans more than two million square miles, was a reliable carbon sink, meaning that it naturally absorbed high levels of carbon dioxide from the air, and it played an important role in keeping the global environment stable.
However, in recent decades, humans have increasingly contributed to the degradation of the Amazon, upsetting a crucial natural balance. Of the 17% of forest reduction that occurred over the last 50 years, about 14% of that loss to the agricultural industry, which has burned the land and used it for crops and livestock, the report states.
Burning the rainforest to make room for crops or livestock can pose dangers for the climate, even decades after those fires occur. Research shows that areas that were burned as long ago as 30 years back — and the accompanying decomposing trees — were still considerable sources of carbon dioxide. Past fires and other factors like logging can also degrade nearby areas that were previously untouched and make those areas more susceptible to burning, according to the study.
The report confirms scientists' worse fears
What's happening now is a domino effect of destruction, one that scientists say needs to be curbed — sooner rather than later.
"The Amazon is a carbon source. No doubt," Luciana Gatti, a researcher at Brazil's National Institute for Space Research who led the study, said in an interview with environmental news site Mongabay. "By now we can say that the budget for the Amazon is 0.3 billion tons of carbon per year [released] into the atmosphere. It's a horrible message."
Gatti said that were it not for the emissions from man-made fires, the southeastern part of the Amazon could have continued to be a "carbon sink," meaning it absorbs more CO2 than it lets out. The region is now at a "tipping point," Gatti said. But when faced with the question of whether these disastrous effects could be reversed if we started now, she answered, "I don't know."
Brazil's president has faced criticism for deforestation
Brazil's president, Jair Bolsonaro, has been criticized for years for his environmental policies and aggressive deforestation of the Amazon. But in 2019 he described troubling deforestation data as "lies."
"You have to understand that the Amazon is Brazil's, not yours," Bolsonaro said, according to The Guardian. "If all this devastation you accuse us of doing was done in the past the Amazon would have stopped existing, it would be a big desert."
The following year, deforestation numbers in the region were the highest they'd been in 12 years.
veryGood! (9)
Related
- Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
- Shiloh Jolie granted request to drop Pitt from her last name: Reports
- NASCAR Cup race at Michigan halted by rain after Stage 1, will resume Monday
- What to watch as the Democratic National Convention enters its second day in Chicago
- North Carolina justices rule for restaurants in COVID
- Biden’s offer of a path to US citizenship for spouses leaves some out
- A muscle car that time forgot? Revisiting the 1973 Pontiac GTO Colonnade
- How To Decorate Your Dorm Room for Under $200
- Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
- What to watch as the Democratic National Convention enters its second day in Chicago
Ranking
- 2 killed, 3 injured in shooting at makeshift club in Houston
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Twist of Fate
- Horoscopes Today, August 17, 2024
- George Santos due in court, expected to plead guilty in fraud case, AP source says
- Intellectuals vs. The Internet
- 11-year sentence for Milwaukee woman who killed her sex trafficker draws outrage
- An Alabama police officer shot and killed an armed man, officials say
- Periods don’t have to be painful. Here’s how to find relief from menstrual cramps.
Recommendation
Will the 'Yellowstone' finale be the last episode? What we know about Season 6, spinoffs
'The Bachelorette' hometowns week: Top 4 contestants, where to watch
Hunter in Alaska recovering after being mauled by bear and shot amid effort to fend it off
Little League World Series: Live updates from Monday games
The Daily Money: Spending more on holiday travel?
Oprah honors 'pioneer' Phil Donahue for proving daytime TV should be 'taken seriously'
Archaeologists find mastodon skull in Iowa, search for evidence it interacted with humans
3 things to do if you're worried about having too little saved for retirement