Current:Home > StocksAmazon must pay over $30 million over claims it invaded privacy with Ring and Alexa -Dynamic Money Growth
Amazon must pay over $30 million over claims it invaded privacy with Ring and Alexa
View
Date:2025-04-13 23:19:52
Amazon will pay more than $30 million in fines to settle alleged privacy violations involving its voice assistant Alexa and doorbell camera Ring, according to federal filings.
In one lawsuit, the Federal Trade Commission claims the tech company violated privacy laws by keeping recordings of children's conversations with its voice assistant Alexa, and in another that its employees have monitored customers' Ring camera recordings without their consent.
The FTC alleges Amazon held onto children's voice and geolocation data indefinitely, illegally used it to improve its algorithm and kept transcripts of their interactions with Alexa despite parents' requests to delete them.
The alleged practices would violate the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act, or COPPA, which requires online companies to alert and obtain consent from parents when they gather data for children under age 13 and allow parents to delete the data at will.
In addition to the $25 million civil penalty, Amazon would not be able to use data that has been requested to be deleted. The company also would have to remove children's inactive Alexa accounts and be required to notify its customers about the FTC's actions against the company.
"Amazon's history of misleading parents, keeping children's recordings indefinitely, and flouting parents' deletion requests violated COPPA and sacrificed privacy for profits," said Samuel Levine, director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection, in a statement. "COPPA does not allow companies to keep children's data forever for any reason, and certainly not to train their algorithms."
Until September 2019, Alexa's default settings were to store recordings and transcripts indefinitely. Amazon said it uses the recordings to better understand speech patterns and respond to voice commands, the complaint says.
After the FTC intervened at the time, Amazon added a setting to automatically delete data after three or 18 months, but still kept the indefinite setting as the default.
Amazon said in a statement it disagrees with the FTC's findings and does not believe it violated any laws.
"We take our responsibilities to our customers and their families very seriously," it said. "We have consistently taken steps to protect customer privacy by providing clear privacy disclosures and customer controls, conducting ongoing audits and process improvements, and maintaining strict internal controls to protect customer data."
The company said it requires parental consent for all children's profiles, provides a Children's Privacy Disclosure elaborating on how it uses children's data, allows child recordings and transcripts to be deleted in the Alexa app and erases child profiles that have been inactive for at least 18 months.
More than 800,000 children under age 13 have their own Alexa accounts, according to the complaint.
The FTC claims that when these issues were brought to Amazon's attention, it did not take action to remedy them.
In a separate lawsuit, the FTC seeks a $5.8 million fine for Amazon over claims employees and contractors at Ring — a home surveillance company Amazon bought in 2018 — had full access to customers' videos.
Amazon is also accused of not taking its security protections seriously, as hackers were able to break into two-way video streams to sexually proposition people, call children racial slurs and physically threaten families for ransom.
Despite this, the FTC says, Ring did not implement multi-factor authentication until 2019.
In addition to paying the $5.8 million, which will be issued as customer refunds, Ring would have to delete customers' videos and faces from before 2018, notify customers about the FTC's actions and report any unauthorized access to videos to the FTC.
"Ring's disregard for privacy and security exposed consumers to spying and harassment," Levine said. "The FTC's order makes clear that putting profit over privacy doesn't pay."
The proposed orders require approval from federal judges.
veryGood! (8227)
Related
- Residents worried after ceiling cracks appear following reroofing works at Jalan Tenaga HDB blocks
- From loons to a Lab.: Minnesota's state flag submissions do not disappoint
- Colorado legislature will convene to address skyrocketing property costs
- 2024 Grammy award nominations led by SZA, Billie Eilish and Phoebe Bridgers
- Rams vs. 49ers highlights: LA wins rainy defensive struggle in key divisional game
- Imprisoned Algerian journalist remains behind bars despite expected release
- If You Need Holiday Shopping Inspo, Google Shared the 100 Most Searched for Gift Ideas of 2023
- Mexico City prosecutors accused of asking for phone records of prominent politicians
- Opinion: Gianni Infantino, FIFA sell souls and 2034 World Cup for Saudi Arabia's billions
- Oakland A’s fans are sending MLB owners ‘Stay In Oakland’ boxes as Las Vegas vote nears
Ranking
- See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
- The Best Gifts For The Organized & Those Who Desperately Want to Be
- TikToker Alix Earle Surprises NFL Player Braxton Berrios With Baecation to Bahamas
- Illinois lawmakers OK new nuclear technology but fail to extend private-school scholarships
- Hackers hit Rhode Island benefits system in major cyberattack. Personal data could be released soon
- 16 Amazing Sales Happening This Weekend You'll Regret Missing
- Former New Mexico State players charged with sex crimes in locker-room hazing case
- Keke Palmer Files for Custody of Her and Darius Jackson's Baby Boy
Recommendation
Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
Police investigate vandalism at US Rep. Monica De La Cruz’s Texas office over Israel-Hamas war
US military chief says he is hopeful about resuming military communication with China
Alabama sets date to attempt nation's first nitrogen gas execution of death row inmate
See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
Manchin decision hurts Democrats’ Senate hopes and sparks new speculation about a presidential bid
Federal judge declines to push back Trump’s classified documents trial but postpones other deadlines
AP Week in Pictures: Asia