Current:Home > MyFTC wants to ban fake product reviews, warning that AI could make things worse -Dynamic Money Growth
FTC wants to ban fake product reviews, warning that AI could make things worse
View
Date:2025-04-16 00:48:20
If the Federal Trade Commission has its way, businesses could soon be fined a hefty sum for hosting or promoting fake product reviews online.
Faux five-star and rave reviews of less-than-stellar consumer goods can boost businesses' profits while deceiving consumers, according to the agency, which has proposed a rule to crack down on companies that buy, sell or promote phony user ratings of their products. If the rule is finalized, violators would be subject to penalties of up to $50,000 per infraction, depending on the case.
"The FTC has seen a massive increase in online reviews in the past few years," Serena Viswanathan, associate director of the FTC's division of ad practices, told CBS News. "We're all using them now to make decisions on whether to buy a product, where to stay on vacation. But unfortunately, with the rise in online reviews we have seen that bad actors can manipulate or fake reviews to deceive consumers for their own benefit."
New types of artificial intelligence tools, which can write human-sounding, but bogus, product reviews, also threaten to compound the problem by enabling bad actors to crank out far more fake reviews, according to the consumer watchdog.
Deceptive reviews hurt consumers by making it hard to obtain factual information about products, regulators say.
"The FTC's proposed rule would make it crystal clear that it's illegal to do things like write or sell fake reviews from people who don't exist or never used the product, or to buy positive reviews or even buy negative reviews about your competitors," Viswanathan said.
Boosting "honest companies"
A steady stream of phony product reviews can boost an item's visibility among consumers while obscuring products from more trustworthy companies, according to experts.
"Our proposed rule on fake reviews shows that we're using all available means to attack deceptive advertising in the digital age," said Samuel Levine, Director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection said in a statement. "The rule would trigger civil penalties for violators and should help level the playing field for honest companies."
According to a U.S. PIRG estimate, between 30% and 40% of online reviews are "concocted or are in some way not genuine." Bogus reviews surged during the pandemic when U.S. shoppers made the bulk of their purchases over the internet versus in stores, the consumer advocacy group noted.
Nearly 90% of online shoppers rely on reviews to guide their purchase decisions, according to PIRG.
"Not only does this harm consumers who are trying to make informed buying decisions, fake reviews also hurt honest businesses who make sure their online reviews are genuine. When people lose confidence in reviews, legitimate positive reviews don't mean as much. So consumers lose. Honest businesses lose. Dishonest businesses win," PIRG said in a report.
Stopping hijackers
The FTC's proposed rule would make selling and buying fake reviews illegal, while also cracking down on a practice known as "review hijacking." This consists of repurposing a genuine consumer review written for one product so that it appears to pertain to a substantially different product.
Also under the proposed enforcement, company insiders cannot review their own products, and businesses cannot bribe people to leave positive reviews or threaten them if they leave negative reviews. Companies would be permitted to offer customers gift cards for leaving a review, so long as the business doesn't dictate what people say about a product.
"We really think that the possibility of significant financial penalties under a rule should make some of these bad actors think twice about writing fake reviews and selling fake reviews," Viswanathan said.
veryGood! (282)
Related
- Nearly half of US teens are online ‘constantly,’ Pew report finds
- 32 things we learned in NFL Week 4: One NFC team separating from the pack?
- Braves host Mets in doubleheader to determine last two NL playoff teams
- Ancestral land returned to Onondaga Nation in upstate New York
- Macy's says employee who allegedly hid $150 million in expenses had no major 'impact'
- North Carolina town bands together after Helene wreaked havoc: 'That's what we do'
- Here’s how Helene and other storms dumped a whopping 40 trillion gallons of rain on the South
- San Diego Padres back in MLB playoffs after 'selfishness' doomed last season's flop
- 'Vanderpump Rules' star DJ James Kennedy arrested on domestic violence charges
- Opinion: Child care costs widened the pay gap. Women in their 30s are taking the hit.
Ranking
- New data highlights 'achievement gap' for students in the US
- Donald Trump suggests ‘one rough hour’ of policing will end theft
- RHONY's Brynn Whitfield Addresses Costar Rebecca Minkoff's Scientology Past
- Braves host Mets in doubleheader to determine last two NL playoff teams
- NFL Week 15 picks straight up and against spread: Bills, Lions put No. 1 seed hopes on line
- Benny Blanco Has the Best Reaction to Selena Gomez’s Sexy Shoutout
- Biden says Olympians represented ‘the very best of America’
- Texas can no longer investigate alleged cases of vote harvesting, federal judge says
Recommendation
Alex Murdaugh’s murder appeal cites biased clerk and prejudicial evidence
Atlanta Braves and New York Mets players celebrate clinching playoff spots together
Man charged with attempting to assassinate Trump will appear in court
Ozzie Virgil Sr., Detroit Tigers trailblazer who broke color barrier, dies at 92
Trump suggestion that Egypt, Jordan absorb Palestinians from Gaza draws rejections, confusion
Epic Games sues Google and Samsung over phone settings, accusing them of violating antitrust laws
A port strike could cost the economy $5 billion per day, here's what it could mean for you
‘SNL’ 50th season premiere gets more than 5M viewers, its best opener since 2020